Research Details

Abstract

Previous work has reliably demonstrated that when people experience more subjective ambivalence about an attitude object, their attitudes have less impact on strength-related outcomes such as attitude-related thinking, judging, or behaving. However, previous research has not considered whether the amount of perceived knowledge a person has about the topic might moderate these effects. Across eight studies on different topics using a variety of outcome measures, the current research demonstrates that perceived knowledge can moderate the relation between ambivalence and the impact of attitudes on related thinking, judging, and behaving. Although the typical Attitude × Ambivalence effect emerged when participants had relatively high perceived knowledge, this interaction did not emerge when participants were lower in perceived knowledge. This work provides a more nuanced view of the effects of subjective ambivalence on attitude impact and highlights the importance of understanding the combined impact of attitude strength antecedents.

Type

Article

Author(s)

Laura Wallace, Kathleen Patton, Andrew Luttrell, Vanessa Sawicki, Lee Fabrigar, Jacob Teeny, Tara MacDonald, Richard E. Petty, Duane Wegener

Date Published

2019

Citations

Wallace, Laura, Kathleen Patton, Andrew Luttrell, Vanessa Sawicki, Lee Fabrigar, Jacob Teeny, Tara MacDonald, Richard E. Petty, and Duane Wegener. 2019. Perceived Knowledge Moderates the Relation between Subjective Ambivalence and the ‘Impact’ of Attitudes: An Attitude Strength Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.(5): 709-22.