Take Action

Home | Faculty & Research Overview | Research

Research Details

Private Litigation Costs and Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from the Morrison Ruling, The Accounting Review

Abstract

We examine the causal effect of expected private litigation costs on voluntary disclosure using a natural experiment, the Supreme Court ruling in Morrison v. National Australia Bank. Even though this ruling had no effect on what constituted fraudulent conduct for the purpose of securities litigation, it significantly reduced the expected private litigation costs for foreign cross-listed firms by reducing the pool of potential claimants. It did so by eliminating the right of shareholders who purchased shares on non-US exchanges from seeking compensation in US courts. In the post-Morrison period, we find consistent evidence showing a decrease in voluntary disclosure using analyses that exploit the varying impact of the ruling based on both firm- and country-level attributes. Unlike a number of prior studies, we find that the positive relation between litigation and disclosure does not depend on the direction of the news.

Type

Article

Author(s)

James Naughton, Tjomme O. Rusticus, Clare Wang, Ira Yeung

Date Published

2019

Citations

Naughton, James, Tjomme O. Rusticus, Clare Wang, and Ira Yeung. 2019. Private Litigation Costs and Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from the Morrison Ruling. The Accounting Review.

KELLOGG INSIGHT

Explore leading research and ideas

Find articles, podcast episodes, and videos that spark ideas in lifelong learners, and inspire those looking to advance in their careers.
learn more

COURSE CATALOG

Review Courses & Schedules

Access information about specific courses and their schedules by viewing the interactive course scheduler tool.
LEARN MORE

DEGREE PROGRAMS

Discover the path to your goals

Whether you choose our Full-Time, Part-Time or Executive MBA program, you’ll enjoy the same unparalleled education, exceptional faculty and distinctive culture.
learn more

Take Action