Take Action

Home | Faculty & Research Overview | Research

Research Details

Complexity and Satisficing: Theory and Evidence from Chess

Abstract

We develop a model of satisficing with evaluation errors that incorporates complexity at the level of individual alternatives. In addition to making sharp predictions about the effect of complexity on choice probabilities, the theory yields a new empirical test that leverages complexity to distinguish satisficing from a large class of maximization-based choice procedures. We test and confirm the model predictions in a novel data set with information on hundreds of millions of chess moves by highly experienced players. We further document that skill and time moderate the adverse effect of complexity on the quality of decision-making, and that they complement each other in doing so. Our findings help to shed some of the first light on how complexity affects choice behavior outside of the laboratory.

Type

Working Paper

Author(s)

Yuval Salant, Jorg Spenkuch

Date Published

2022

Citations

Salant, Yuval, and Jorg Spenkuch. 2022. Complexity and Satisficing: Theory and Evidence from Chess.

LINK
KELLOGG INSIGHT

Explore leading research and ideas

Find articles, podcast episodes, and videos that spark ideas in lifelong learners, and inspire those looking to advance in their careers.
learn more

COURSE CATALOG

Review Courses & Schedules

Access information about specific courses and their schedules by viewing the interactive course scheduler tool.
LEARN MORE

DEGREE PROGRAMS

Discover the path to your goals

Whether you choose our Full-Time, Part-Time or Executive MBA program, you’ll enjoy the same unparalleled education, exceptional faculty and distinctive culture.
learn more