Take Action
Research Details
Quantifying the Selective Forgetting and Integration of Ideas in Science and Technology, American Psychologist
Abstract
How long will this article be remembered? How long will people reference it in their conversations, and for how many years will other authors cite its findings in their own works? A community’s attention to a cultural object decays as time passes, a process known as collective forgetting. Recent work models this decay as the result of two different processes. One linked to communicative memory—memories sustained by human communication—and the other linked to cultural memory—memories sustained by the physical recording of content. Collective forgetting has significant impacts on communities, yet little is known about how the collective forgetting dynamic changes over time. Here, we study the temporal changes of collective memory and attention by focusing on two knowledge communities: inventors and physicists. We use data on patents from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and physics papers published by the American Physical Society (APS) to quantify those changes over time. The model enables us to distinguish between two branches of forgetting. One branch is short-lived, going directly from communicative memory to oblivion. The other branch is long-lived, going from communicative memory to cultural memory before going on to oblivion. The data analysis shows an increase in the forgetting rate for both communities as the amount of information in each of them grows. That growth of information forces knowledge communities to increase their selectivity regarding what is stored in their cultural memory. These findings confirm the forgetting as annulment hypothesis and show that knowledge communities can slow down collective forgetting and improve selectivity processes.
Type
Article
Author(s)
Cristian Candia, Brian Uzzi
Date Published
2021
Citations
Candia, Cristian, and Brian Uzzi. 2021. Quantifying the Selective Forgetting and Integration of Ideas in Science and Technology. American Psychologist. 76(6): 1067-1087.
LINK