Start of Main Content
Author(s)

S. Guimond

R. Crisp

P. DeOliviera

R. Kamiejski

Nour Kteily

B. Kuepper

R. Lalonde

S. Levin

F. Pratto

F. Tougas

J. Sidanius

A. Zick

In contrast to authors of previous single-nation studies, we propose that supporting multiculturalism (MC) or assimilation (AS) is likely to have different effects in different countries, depending on the diversity policy in place in a particular country and the associated norms. A causal model of intergroup attitudes and behaviors, integrating both country-specific factors (attitudes and perceived norms related to a particular diversity policy) and general social-psychological determinants (social dominance orientation), was tested among participants from countries where the pro-diversity policy was independently classified as low, medium, or high (N
Date Published: 2013
Citations: Guimond, S., R. Crisp, P. DeOliviera, R. Kamiejski, Nour Kteily, B. Kuepper, R. Lalonde, S. Levin, F. Pratto, F. Tougas, J. Sidanius, A. Zick. 2013. Diversity Policy, Social Dominance, and Intergroup Relations: Predicting Prejudice in Changing Social and Political Contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 941-958.