Start of Main Content
Author(s)

Keith Markman

Matthew Lindberg

Laura Kray

Adam Galinsky

In the present research, the authors hypothesized that additive counterfactual thinking mind-sets, activated by adding new antecedent elements to reconstruct reality, promote an expansive processing style that broadens conceptual attention and facilitates performance on creative generation tasks, whereas subtractive counter-factual thinking mind-sets, activated by removing antecedent elements to reconstruct reality, promote a relational processing style that enhances tendencies to consider relationships and associations and facilitates performance on analytical problem-solving tasks. A reanalysis of a published data set suggested that the counterfactual mind-set primes previously used in the literature tend to evoke subtractive counterfactuals. Studies 1 and 2 then demonstrated that subtractive counterfactual mind-sets enhanced performance on analytical problem-solving tasks relative to additive counterfactual mind-sets, whereas Studies 3 and 4 found that additive counterfactual mind-sets enhanced performance on creative generation tasks relative to subtractive counterfactual mind-sets.
Date Published: 2007
Citations: Markman, Keith, Matthew Lindberg, Laura Kray, Adam Galinsky. 2007. Implications of Counterfactual Structure for Creative Generation and Analytical Problem Solving. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. (3)312-324.