Data
for Testing Standard Error Estimation Programs
To test the different programs, I created a test data set. The data set contains four variables: a firm identifier (firmid), a time variable (year), the independent variable (x), and the dependent variable (y). The residual and the independent variable both contain a firm effect, but no year effect. Thus the standard errors clustered by firm are different from the OLS standard errors (and the standard errors clustered by firm and year are different than the standard errors clustered by year). I have posted this data set as a text file and as a Stata data set. The results of running the OLS regression with OLS standard errors, White standard errors and clustered standard errors ï¿½ as well as FamaMacBeth coefficients and standard errors are reported below.
Variable 
Coefficient 
Standard Error 
Tstatistic 
Constant 
0.0297 
0.0284 
ï¿½
1.05 
X 
1.0348 
0.0286 
36.20 



R^{2} = 0.2078 
Variable 
Coefficient 
Standard Error 
Tstatistic 
Constant 
0.0297 
0.0284 
ï¿½
1.05 
X 
1.0348 
0.0284 
36.44 



R^{2} = 0.2078 
Variable 
Coefficient 
Standard Error 
Tstatistic 
Constant 
0.0297 
0.0670 
0.44 
X 
1.0348 
0.0506 
20.45 



R^{2} = 0.2078 
Variable 
Coefficient 
Standard Error 
Tstatistic 
Constant 
0.0297 
0.0234 
1.27 
X 
1.0348 
0.0334 
30.99 



R^{2} = 0.2078 
Variable 
Coefficient 
Standard Error 
Tstatistic 
Constant 
0.0297 
0.0651 
0.46 
X 
1.0348 
0.0536 
19.32 



R^{2} = 0.2078 
Variable 
Coefficient 
Standard Error 
Tstatistic 
Constant 
0.0313 
0.0234 
1.34 
X 
1.0356 
0.0333 
31.06 



R^{2} = 0.2078 
In SAS you can specify multiple variables in the cluster statement. For example, you could put both firm and year as the cluster variables. Using the test data set, I ran the regression in SAS and put both the firm identifier (firmid) and the time identifier (year) in the cluster statement. The SAS commands are:
proc surveyreg
data=mydata;
cluster firmid
year;
model y = x ;
The results are:
Variable 
Coefficient 
Standard Error 
Tstatistic 
Constant 
0.0297 
0.0284 
1.05 
X 
1.0348 
0.0284 
36.44 



R^{2} = 0.2078 
These are White standard errors, not standard errors clustered by both firm and time. To see this, compare these results to the results above for White standard errors and standard errors clustered by firm and year. The reason is when you tell SAS to cluster by firmid and year it allows observations with the same firmid and and the same year to be correlated. Since there is only one observation for each firm year in the sample, this assumes all residuals are uncorrelated (SAS assumes there are 5,000 clusters). In my paper, in Thompson (2006) and in Cameron, Gelbach and Miller (2006), when we discussed clustering by firm and year, this allows the residuals of observations from the same firm or the same year to be correlated.