Take Action
Research Details
Sugar Daddy: Quotas and the U.S. Government
Abstract
Since 1981, the U.S. federal government has operated a price support program to help sugar beet and sugar cane producers and processors. This complex program works through a combination of loans, import quotas, and duties. As a result, sugar prices in the United States are significantly higher than world prices. For example, in December 2001, U.S. consumers paid 22.9 cents per pound, while the world price was just 9 cents per pound. The General Accounting Office estimates that the total cost to consumers is $1.9 billion a year. This case uses a simple demand-and-supply framework, using real-world data, to assess the economic and political consequences of the U.S. sugar program. The case provides students with a vivid, fact-based illustration of welfare concepts such as consumer surplus, producer surplus, and dead-weight loss in a concrete, real-world market context.
Type
Case
Author(s)
Nabil Al-Najjar, Sandeep Baliga, Chris Forman
Date Published
01/01/2004
Discipline
Economics
Key Concepts
International Trade, Quotas, Government Interventions, Welfare, Consumer and Producer Surplus
Citations
Al-Najjar, Nabil, Sandeep Baliga, and Chris Forman. Sugar Daddy: Quotas and the U.S. Government. Case 5-204-255 (KEL001).
PREVIEW or BUY