OVER THEIR HEADS
Small Investors, Too, Get
Nailed by Arcane Trades
Hedging Plans Failed,
As They Did for Experts;
'Short Strangle' Lesson
By ELEANOR LAISE, E.S. BROWNING, JENNIFER LEVITZ and CRAIG KARMIN August 14, 2007; Page A1
By day, Brian Abbott is a doctor at a cancer institute
in Great Falls, Mont. In his off hours, he invests with borrowed money,
shorts stocks and has taken a complex options position called a "short
strangle" on wheat.
He has been trying to bulletproof his portfolio
against sudden market declines, using investment tools usually
associated with hedge funds and banks. But rather than protecting his
$1 million or so in holdings, the 35-year-old physician says he left it
vulnerable.
"Things that should have protected me weren't
working," Dr. Abbott says of the market in recent weeks. "Everything
was seeming to go down."
A growing number of nonprofessional investors have
sought protection from market drops, such as the Dow Jones Industrial
Average's 38% fall during the bear market of 2000 to 2002. Wall
Street's financial engineers have devised a wealth of products to help
Main Street investors diversify or hedge like the pros. As a result,
many ordinary investors have shifted toward foreign stocks and
currencies, or "market neutral" funds that are supposed to be steadier
than ordinary mutual funds. They're dabbling in commodities futures and
short selling, an investment bet that pays off if shares decline.
UNPROTECTED
• What's New: Since the last bear market, many ordinary investors have adopted sophisticated tools to hedge and diversify their portfolios.
• Reality Check: The protective measures aren't working so well in the current market, because too many factors are turning south.
• Bottom Line: Even professional traders are finding it hard to track all the conditions needed to make exotic hedging products work.
Now these small investors are facing the same problems as Wall Street pros: Many of the hedges aren't working as they expected.
In the past
month, the market has been behaving in ways even seasoned players have
been at a loss to explain. First the sagging housing market drove down
the value of widely used investment vehicles tied to low-quality
mortgages. Jitters bled into the broader credit markets, and, as
troubled investment funds announced heavy losses, stock markets
gyrated. Investments that were supposed to be diverse and uncorrelated
-- including stocks, corporate bonds and commodities such as gold --
have fallen at once.
Many smaller investors in the U.S., particularly those
whose portfolios favor blue-chip shares, have so far watched a
whipsawing market without suffering big losses. But the cash inflows
suggest that a good number of individual investors are exposed.
So far this year, U.S. investors on balance have put
$81.28 billion into foreign funds, compared with $8.09 billion into
plain-vanilla U.S. stock mutual funds, according to the Investment
Company Institute, a mutual-fund trade association. (Traditionally,
U.S. investors almost always have put much more money into U.S.-stock
funds.)
The yen for foreign investment has also been
stimulated by a host of new exchange-traded funds -- funds that contain
baskets of investments and trade like stocks -- which let people
directly play the markets of countries such as South Korea, Sweden and
Brazil. ETFs also let investors bet on commodities and a wide variety
of U.S. stock sectors. In this year's first seven months, 179 new ETFs
were launched, bringing the total to 538, according to State Street
Global Advisors.
Individual investors have expanded into other arenas
as well. At optionsXpress Holdings Inc., an online retail brokerage
specializing in options and futures, investors made 555,400 options
trades in July, up 46% from a year earlier. Margin balances -- that is,
loans to customers -- hit $178 million, up 20% from a year ago, it
says. The brokerage doesn't require a minimum investment to open an
account; the minimum for a margin account is $2,000.
Steady Income
Historically, individuals tended to limit themselves
to stocks and bonds -- stocks to provide capital gains, and bonds for
steady income. But the stock craze of the 1990s and the advent of
online investing changed that for many people. Now amateur investors
can easily trade not only U.S. stocks but also options, futures and
ETFs.
Like most investors in the 1990s, Ed Chambless, a
retired airline pilot and a former Marine officer, had much of his
money in U.S. stocks. The powerful bull market made it seem
unnecessary, even foolish, to invest heavily abroad.
But the long bear market took a big bite out of his
family's savings and made him wary. After he sold his Atlanta home and
some other property in Augusta, Ga., in 2002, Mr. Chambless invested
the proceeds from those sales more internationally, and in a wider
variety of more sophisticated investments, to protect against another
sell-off.
Around that time, he attended an extravagant
investment trade event in Las Vegas, the Money Show, aimed at
individual investors. He was impressed with a presentation about
growing global demand for commodities. "With China and India coming on
line, they're going to need a lot of stuff," the 69-year-old, now in
Denton, Texas, recalls thinking.
Mr. Chambless bought a natural-resources mutual fund,
and another that tracked commodities. He added a precious-metals fund
and scooped up some individual mining stocks, like Newmont Mining Corp.
and Northgate Minerals Corp. and the Russian energy company Yukos.
Trying Japanese REITs
Worried that U.S. government spending would be a
long-term drag on the dollar, he bought certificates of deposit for the
Australian and New Zealand dollars. He also invested in a Japanese
real-estate investment trust. "I try, obviously, to be diversified," he
says. His record has been one of slow but steady appreciation: His
$850,000 savings from 2002 is around $1 million today.
Over the past four weeks, he's seen his portfolio
reduced by $27,000. He believes he's positioned to ride out this
current market slide, though he wishes he'd have kept a bit more of his
money in cash. With so many investments to track now, he's not sure
which ones tumbled the most during the recent turmoil.
"That's something I probably ought to know," Mr. Chambless says. "Right now it seems like everything is sort of going down."
Barron Segar, 44, who works in Atlanta for a nonprofit
group, says he has been shocked at the losses in an investment that he
thought would be a conservative way to hedge against risk. To help
stabilize his portfolio, Mr. Segar says, he put about 5% of his
portfolio into TFS Market Neutral fund. Market neutral funds buy stocks
and also engage in short selling, in an effort to show gains in both up
and down markets.
Mr. Segar chose the TFS fund as an alternative to a
bond mutual fund. In the late 1990s, he had about 25% of his portfolio
in conservative investments such as bond funds and cash. But as bond
yields fell in recent years, he looked for alternatives.
The TFS fund is down 7% for the three months through
Aug. 10. The decline has made Mr. Segar rethink his decision, and he
has withdrawn some money. "This fund has done worse than my aggressive
growth fund," Mr. Segar says.
Richard Gates, a co-manager of the fund, says in the
market's recent turmoil, both the fund's regular stock investments and
short positions were hit simultaneously. He points to the fund's
long-term track record, up an average 10.7% annualized since inception
in September 2004, according to the TFS Web site.
Financial planner Reed Rinderknecht says that in the
past 12 to 18 months, investors have asked questions about everything
from ETFs to the short and long funds they read about in electronic
newsletters or on brokerage Web sites. "We see people shooting
themselves in the foot all the time," says Mr. Rinderknecht, a partner
at Foster Group, a fee-only financial-planning firm in West Des Moines,
Iowa, that specializes in broadly diversified, long-term investments.
"A little information can be deadly -- because people know just enough
to get themselves in trouble."
Short Sellers' Timing
Pitfalls abound, even for experts. Short selling is
considered riskier than standard stock investing because it involves
borrowing stock and selling it. The broker that lends the stock can
demand its return before the investor has made a profit. If a stock
rises more than 100%, the short investor can lose more than 100% of his
investment -- which isn't possible with a simple stock purchase. What's
more, stocks generally rise when the economy is growing, so a short
seller must act at just the right time, something even experts have
trouble doing.
Commodities, options and futures are risky, meanwhile,
because those markets can swing sharply, and because the trading
accounts involved often use borrowed money. Foreign stock markets,
particularly those of developing countries, can be more volatile than
U.S. markets. Investors can also find it be challenging to obtain
information about them.
James Hayden of Falls Church, Va., a 71-year-old
retiree, started investing about two months ago in developing-country
ETFs, in hopes of diversifying his risk and improving his returns. To
choose ETFs, he says, he used research tools offered on the Web site of
Chicago-based fund researcher Morningstar Inc.
'Ouch! It's Terrible'
Until then, in his 14 years of active investing, he
had bought only regular mutual funds. He "lost a lot of money" in the
collapse of the tech-stock bubble, he says, but gradually regained it.
Lately, he has tried to invest in the parts of the world that have
showed the highest total investment returns.
"Ouch! It's terrible," he says of his Brazil and Korea
funds, which fell 5% last week. "I need this money to pay bills," says
Mr. Hayden, a retired photographer for the Smithsonian Institution. He
rents his home and lives on what he calls a modest pension, which is
why he's trying to be aggressive in investing. All of his savings are
in his investment portfolio, which he values at less than $100,000. He
figures that 20% is in his two ETFs, with the rest in five mutual funds.
Not all of the investors are bleeding. For his part,
Dr. Abbott of Great Falls figures that his portfolio is still up about
5% overall for the year, thanks mostly to bond holdings. Even so, he
says he may have gotten in too deep. Until last year, he invested in
ordinary stocks, as well as stock and bond mutual funds, and dabbled
modestly in more arcane investments. He made a big push to diversify
last year after the summer's market volatility. "It made me want to
smooth things out a bit, performance-wise," Dr. Abbott says.
Now, investing online through six accounts, he has
been trading in and out of funds with names such as the UltraShort QQQ
ProShares ETF, which aims to move twice as much as, and in the opposite
direction to, 100 large Nasdaq stocks. He owns the American Century
Long-Short Equity Fund, which bets on both stock gains and declines in
an effort to rise regardless of market conditions. About a year ago, he
started investing directly in commodities futures contracts.
In the past six months, he bought the CurrencyShares
Swiss Franc Trust, an exchange-traded product that tracks the Swiss
currency. Recently he's even tried currency and interest-rate futures
trading. "That's a pretty advanced thing," he concedes. "I'm not an
expert."
A few months ago, he entered into the "short strangle"
options position on wheat, using borrowed money. He stood to profit if
prices remained stable. When wheat prices soared, he was about to face
a margin call -- a demand from his broker for repayment. He got out of
the position with a loss of about $5,000.
Shorting Amazon
Now, Dr. Abbott's American Century Long-Short Equity
Fund is down nearly 7% in the month ending Aug. 10, lagging the S&P
500 by more than 3 percentage points. His short positions in Amazon.com
Inc. and Google Inc. haven't worked out as he anticipated, either. He
is also concerned about correctly timing his exit from the UltraShort
ProShares ETF. His $10,000 investment in the instrument could take a
severe hit if the market starts to rally.
In the end, he says, holding so many exotic
instruments has been overwhelming. He says he's shifting money back to
a broad stock-index fund, and he's reduced his short position in Amazon.
"This points to the difficulty of being an individual
investor. You have to time things," he says. "Few people can do the
timing right, and I don't think I'm even one of them."
--Shefali Anand contributed to this article.
Write to Eleanor Laise at eleanor.laise@wsj.com1, E.S. Browning at jim.browning@wsj.com2, Jennifer Levitz at jennifer.levitz@wsj.com3 and Craig Karmin at craig.karmin@wsj.com4
|