The
Costs and Benefits of Managerial Incentives and Monitoring
in Large U.S. Corporations: When More is not Better?
Edward
J. Zajac and James D. Westphal,
Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, 121-142 (1994)
Recent research
and public discourse on executive compensation and corporate
governance suggests a growing consensus that firms can and
should increase their control over top managers by increasing
the use of managerial incentives and monitoring by boards
of directors. This study departs from this consensus by offering
an alternative perspective that considers not only the benefits,
but also the costs of both incentives and monitoring in large
corporations. The study develops and tests a contingency cost/benefit
perspective on governance decisions as resource allocation
decisions, proposing how and why the observed levels of managerial
incentives and monitoring may vary across organizations and
across time. Specifically, the study suggests that: (1) firms
that are more risky face greater costs when using incentive
compensation contracts for top managers, thus reducing the
expected level of incentive compensation use for such firms;
(2) firms facing this problem of low incentive compensation
use can realize greater benefits from higher levels of board
monitoring, and thus are likely to rely more on board monitoring;
and (3) firms with more complex corporate strategies face
higher costs in using board monitoring, and are thus likely
to rely less on board monitoring as a source of controlling
top management behavior. The study also proposes that within
this contingency perspective there may be diminishing `behavioral
returns' to increases in monitoring and incentives. These
hypotheses are tested using extensive longitudinal data from
over 400 of the largest U.S. corporations. The supportive
findings suggest that maximal levels of incentives and monitoring
are not necessarily optimal, and that a firm's strategy may
not only have significant product/market implications, but
also corporate governance implications.
(full
text article-Kellogg community only)
(to
request a full-text copy, email the center)
|