Center for Operations and Supply Chain ManagementKellogg School of Management
Center InformationMEDS DepartmentContactKellogg Homepage
News & Events
Information for Students
Faculty
Research
Working Papers
Seminars
Workshops
Job Opportunities
Online Resources
Operations Club
Master of Management & Manufacturing (MMM) Program
 
 
Index
Search
Internal Site
Northwestern University
 

Seminars

The following speakers will visit Kellogg this Spring as part of the 2013 Kellogg Operations Seminar Series. Please click on a date for more information about a particular talk. The Presentations are at noon in Jacobs, Room 561 unless noted.

Ilan Lobel NYU 9/24/2014

John Birge

U Chicago 10/1/2014
Sang Kim Yale 10/8/2014
Terry Taylor UC Berkeley 10/15/2014
Irina Dolinskaya Northwestern 10/22/2014
Chris Ryan U Chicago 10/29/2014
Ramandeep Randhawa USC 11/5/2014
Jay Swaminathan UNC 11/19/2014

View past seminars

"The Impact of Inventory Management on Patient Access to Drugs in Sub-Saharan Africa: Secondary Analysis and Simulation of a Field Experiment in Zambia"
Talk by Jeremie Gallien, London Business School
February 5th, 2014
Despite successful improvements efforts by the government and partners, the public pharmaceutical distribution system in Zambia still results in low service levels relative to private sector standards. A recent field experiment conducted in Zambia and reported in Friedman et al. (2013) offers an opportunity to further understand and improve patient access to medicines in this setting and other low-income countries. We present a secondary analysis of that experiment and justify an alternative supply chain design involving mobile devices and optimization. Results from a validated simulation model suggest that this proposal would increase drug availability and reduce inventory costs. We finally report on its implementation status

(joint work with Z. Leung, P. Yadav and A. Chen).

"Equilibrium in a two dimensional queueing game: When inspecting the queue is costly"
Talk by Ricky Roet-Green, Rotman School of Management
January 22nd, 2014

The classical model of customers decision making in an unobservable queue assumes that it is too costly to acquire the queue length information. However, due to recent advancements in communication technology, various services make that kind of information accessible to customers at a reasonable cost. Our model reflects this new opportunity. In our model, customers of an unobservable queue can choose among three options: join the queue, balk, or acquire information about the queue length and then decide whether or not to join it. When customers decision problem includes only two possible actions, it is intuitively expected that the action taken by an individual who tries to avoid congestion will be inversely correlated with the actions taken by the others. In a model of more than two actions, the strategy of the customers in equilibrium is not straightforward. We compute the equilibrium in this model and prove its existence and uniqueness. We also show that the monopoly firm can benefit from offering this third possibility of obtaining queue length information, by enlarging the throughput of customers to the system. Comparing to the classical queue policies, the observable and unobservable queue models, we show that in many cases, the number of customers that enter the queue will be larger with the alternative queue policy that we present in our model.

"Data-Driven Operation Research Analyses in the Public Sector"
Talk by Larry Wein, Stanford
October 23rd, 2013
I will describe several recent projects in the public sector, including screening and treatment for childhood obesity, allocating blood for transfusions, optimizing ballistic imaging performance using spatiotemporal crime data, allocating ready-to-use food to children in developing countries, and optimizing the biometric aspects of India's universal identification (UIDAI) program. Each project started with a large longitudinal data set that guided the mathematical modeling, and resulted in a recommended policy that outperforms the current policy. For each project, I will briefly describe the problem motivation, the data set, the mathematical model (which was embedded into an optimization problem), the statistical analysis required to calibrate the model, the numberical results from solving the optimization problem, and the policy implications.

"The d-Level Nested Logit Model"
Talk by Paat Rusmevichientong, USC
September 25th, 2013

We provide a new tree-based formulation for the d-level nested logit model, allowing for an arbitrary number of levels. We then consider the canonical revenue management problem of finding a revenue-maximizing assortment under this choice model. By exploiting the succinct descriptions of the selection probabilities and expected revenues under our formulation, we develop an efficient algorithm for computing an optimal assortment. For a d-level nested logit model with n products, the running time of the algorithm is O (d n log n).

(Joint work with Huseyin Topaloglu and Guang Li)

 

"Herding in a Queue: A Laboratory Experiment"
Talk by Laurens Debo, The Booth School, University of Chicago
May 29th, 2013

We study the impact of wait time on consumers' purchasing behavior when the quality of the product is unknown to some consumers (the 'uninformed consumers'), but known to others ('the informed consumers'). In a capacitated environment, the wait times for the product act as a signal of quality for the uninformed consumers because, due to the informed consumers in the population, low (high) quality products tend to generate shorter (longer) wait times. Hence, longer waiting times may increase the uninformed consumers' perceived quality. That is, uninformed consumers may 'herd' and still purchase the product, even when the wait time is long. This paper presents a theory of learning from wait times that predicts that purchasing frequency may increase in quoted wait time. Our results from a series of controlled laboratory experiments confirm this prediction. We show that a relatively low fraction of informed consumers suffices to create such 'herding' behavior of uninformed consumers.

(Joint work with Mirko Kremer)

"Cohort Turnover and Productivity: The July Phenomenon in Teaching Hospitals"
Talk by Robert S. Huckman, Harvard University and NBER
April 17th, 2013

We consider the impact of cohort turnover - the planned simultaneous exit of experienced employees and a similarly sized entry of new workers - on productivity in the context of teaching hospitals. Specifically, we examine the impact of the annual July turnover of residents in American teaching hospitals on levels of resource utilization and quality in teaching hospitals relative to a control group of non-teaching hospitals. We find that this annual cohort turnover results in increased resource utilization (i.e., higher length of hospital stay) for both minor and major teaching hospitals, and decreased quality (i.e., higher mortality rates) for major teaching hospitals. Specifically in major teaching hospitals, we find evidence of a gradual trend of decreasing performance that begins several months before the actual cohort turnover, which may result from a transition of responsibilities that occurs at major teaching hospitals in anticipation of the upcoming cohort turnover.

(Joint work with Hummy Song and Jason R. Barro)

"Which Suppliers Adhere to Global Labor Standards? Evidence from Codes of Conduct Audits"
Talk by Mike Toffel, Harvard Business School
April 10th, 2013

In response to stakeholder pressures, many transnational businesses have developed codes of conduct and monitoring systems to ensure that working conditions in their supply chains meet global labor standards. Many observers have questioned whether this form of private regulation has any impact on working conditions or is merely a marketing tool to deflect criticism of valuable global brands. We conduct one of the first large-scale comparative studies using codes of conduct audits from one of the world's largest social auditors to determine what combination of government and civil society institutions promote compliance with the global labor standards embodied in these codes. We find that these private transnational governance tools are most effective when they are embedded in states that have made binding domestic and international legal commitments to protect workers' rights and that have high levels of press freedom and nongovernmental organization activity. Taken together, these findings suggest the importance of multiple, robust, overlapping, and reinforcing governance regimes to meaningful transnational regulation.

"Management of Energy Technology for Sustainability: Funding Energy Technology R&D"
Talk by Erin Baker, University of Massachusetts Amherst
March 20th, 2013

Climate change is a major pupblic policy problem. One vexing problem faced by policy makers is how to allocate research budgets across a variety of energy technologies, in order to reduce the future costs of controlling climate change. In this paper we apply a multi-model approach, implementing probabilistic data derived from expert elicitations into a stochastic programming version of a dynamic integrated assessment model, in order to arrive at insights about the optimal government-funded R&D portfolio. We focus on electricity technologies with a significant chance of a breakthrough – solar PV, CCS, and nuclear. We find that the optimal investment is fairly robust to different specifications of climate uncertainty, to different policy environments, and to assumptions about the opportunity cost of investing; and that policy makers would do better to over-invest in R&D rather than under-invest. We show that R&D is even more valuable in “2nd-best” policy environments, when politics, incentives, and uncertainty don’t lead to optimal policies. Finally, we show that R&D can play different roles in different types of policy environments, sometimes leading primarily to cost reduction, other times leading to better environmental outcomes.

"Optimal Design of Social Comparison Effects: Setting Reference Groups and Reference Points"
Talk by Xuanming Su, Wharton
March 13th, 2013

In this paper, we study how social planners should exploit social comparisons to pursue their objectives. We consider two modes of social comparison, referred to as behind-averse and ahead-seeking behaviors, depending on whether individuals experience a utility loss from under-performing or a utility gain from over-performing relative to their peers. Modeling social comparison as a game between players, we find that ahead-seeking behavior leads to output polarization whereas behind-averse behavior leads to output clustering. A social planner can mitigate these effects in two ways, (i) by providing the full reference distribution of outputs instead of an aggregate reference point based on the average output, and (ii) by assigning players into uniform rather than diverse reference groups. Social planners may thus need to tailor the reference structure to the predominant mode of social comparison and their objective. A performance-focused social planner may set the reference structure so as to maximize the output of either the top or the bottom player depending on whether she puts greater marginal weight to larger or smaller outputs. When the social planner also cares about utility, she faces a dilemma because performance-optimization may not be aligned with utility-maximization. Inevitably, the social planner will have to confront equity issues because better performance may not reflect great effort or greater ability.

(Joint work with Guillaume Roels)

"Collaboration in Service Networks: Architectures and Throughput"
Talk by Itai Gurvich, Kellogg
March 6th, 2013

Motivated by the trend towards more collaboration in service work flows, we study processes where some activities require the collaboration of multiple human resources. Collaboration introduces synchronization requirements that are not captured in the conventional procedure to identify bottlenecks and theoretical capacity. We introduce the notions of collaboration architecture and unavoidable idleness. In general, collaboration architectures may feature unavoidable idleness i.e that the theoretical capacity exceeds the maximal achievable throughput or actual capacity. This fundamental tradeoff between collaboration and efficiency does not disappear with scale and has important ramifications to service-system staffing. We identify a special class of collaboration architectures that have no unavoidable idleness. Identifying that the theoretical capacity matches the actual capacity still leaves open the question of how to coordinate/synchronize the resources to achieve that capacity. In collaborative networks, there is a tradeoff between throughput and controllability that cannot be avoided. We study the implications of this tradeoff to the choice of prioritization-and-synchronization policies.

(Joint work with Jan Van Mieghem)

"Structural Estimation of Callers' Delay Sensitivity in Call Center"
Talk by Seyed Emadi, Kellogg
February 27th, 2013

We model callers' decision making processin call centers as an optimal stopping problem. After each period of waiting, a caller decides whether to abandon or to continue to wait. The utility of a caller is modeled as a function of her waiting cost and reward for service. We use a random-coefficients model to capture the heterogeneity of the callers and estimate the cost and reward parameters of the callers using the data of individual calls made to an Israeli call center. We also conduct a series of counterfactual analyses that explore the effects of changes in service discipline on resulting waiting times and abandonment rates. Our analysis reveals that modeling endogenous caller behavior can be important when major changes (such as a change in service discipline) are performed, and that using a model with an exogenously specified abandonment distribution may be misleading.

"Patient Flow Management in Emergency Departments"
Talk by Junfei Huang, NUS, visiting Kellogg
February 13th, 2013

Motivated by its significant impact on quality of care and patient satisfaction, we consider the patient flow management problem in emergency departments (EDs): a choice must be made between triage patients who are yet to be checked vs. those who are in-process (IP). Physicians' capacity is modeled as a queing system with multi-class customers, where some of the classes face deadline constraints on their time-till-first-service, while the other classes feedback through service while incurring congestion costs. We consider two types of such costs: per individual visit to a server or cumulative over all visits. In both cases, we propose and analyze scheduling policies that, asymptotically in conventional heavy-traffic, minimize congestion costs while adhering to all deadline constraints. Via data from the complex ED reality, we use our models to quantify the value of refined individual information, for example whether an ED patient will be admitted to the hospital as opposed to being dicharged. Finally, for our proposed policies, we develop some congestion laws that support forecasting of waiting and sojourn times.

"Integrating Inventory Replenishment and Cash Payment Decisions in Supply Chains"
Talk by Kevin Shang, Duke
October 3rd, 2012
This paper studies the impact of financial integration on a supply chain consisting of a retailer who periodically orders from a supplier in a finite horizon. The retailer and the supplier form a partnership or strategic alliance, aiming to minimize the entire supply chain cost. The retailer pays the supplier for inventory replenishment and decides investment amount in each period. We consider two payment schemes that represent different levels of financial integration. For flexible payment, the retailer is allowed to prepay or delay the payment (with no debt at the end of the horizon); for the strict payment scheme, the retailer pays exactly what she orders. We prove that the optimal joint policy for the flexible payment model has a surprisingly simple structure -- both parties implement a base-stock policy for inventory replenishment; the retailer monitors her cash level and implements a two-threshold policy for investment and a pay-up-to policy for inventory payment. Solving the strict payment model is more involved. We derive a lower bound on the optimal cost by connecting the strict payment model to an assembly system and propose a simple heuristic. Comparing the optimal costs between the flexible and strict payment models yields the true value of payment flexibility. The results of numerical studies suggest that the value of flexible payment can be very significant and that the volatility of material and financial flows may not amplify in the same direction under the flexile payment scheme. Finally, we relate a vertically integrated system to the flexible payment one. Interestingly, we find that the additional benefit achieved by vertical integration may not be significant.

 

"Double-Counting of Emissions in Carbon-Optimal and Carbon-Neutral Supply Chains"
Talk by Felipe Caro, UCLA
October 24th, 2012

Carbon footprinting is a tool for firms to determine the total greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with their supply chain or with a unit of final product or service. Carbon footprinting typically aims to identify where best to invest in emission reduction efforts, and/or to determine the proportion of total emissions that an individual firm is accountable for, whether financially and/or operationally. A major and under-recognized challenge in determining the appropriate allocation stems from the high degree to which GHG emissions are the result of joint efforts by multiple firms. As more firms make (part of) their supply chains carbon neutral, by choice or by regulation, these allocation questions become more critical.

We introduce a simple but effective model of joint production of GHG emissions in general supply chains, decomposing the total footprint into processes, each of which can be influenced by any combination of firms. A supply chain in which all firms exert their first-best emissions reduction effort levels is "carbon-optimal", while one which offsets all emissions is "carbon-neutral". With this structure, we examine conditions under which a carbon-neutral supply chain will also be carbon-optimal. We find that, in order to induce the carbon-optimal effort levels, the emissions need to be over-allocated, in contrast to the usual focus in the life cycle assessment (LCA) and carbon footprinting literatures on avoiding double-counting. We analyze the problem from the perspective of the social planner as well as that of a "carbon leader", a single firm that offsets all supply chain emissions and that can contract with other firms to encourage them to help reduce emissions. We show that even when the carbon leader can only contract on emissions, she can still induce the same effort levels and profits as when she can contract directly on effort. Our work aims to lay the foundation for a framework to integrate the
economics- and LCA-based perspectives on supply chain carbon footprinting.

(Joint work with Charles Corbett, Tarkan Tan and Rob Zuidwijk)

 

"Online Stochastic Bin Packing"
Talk by Varun Gupta, Booth
October 31st, 2012

Motivated by the problem of packing Virtual Machines on physical servers in cloud computing, we study the problem of one-dimensional online stochastic bin packing. Items with sizes sampled from an unknown distribution arrive as a stream and must be packed on arrival. The size of an item is known when it arrives and the goal is to minimize the number of non-empty bins. Online stochastic bin packing has been extensively studied in theoretical computer science, combinatorics, and probability literature, and there exist many heuristics. However all such heuristics are either optimal for only certain classes of item size distributions, or rely on learning the unknown distribution. We present a new distribution-agnostic bin packing heuristic that is asymptotically optimal for all distributions, and is extremely simple to implement.

Next, we consider the more general problem of online stochastic bin packing with item departures to which our algorithm extends as-is. We also revisit the popular Best Fit packing heuristic, which has not been studied so far in the setting of item departures.

(Joint work with Ana Radovanovic)

 

"Pricing Tools and Salespeople -- The Effectiveness of Pricing Decision Support Tools in Business-To-Business Markets"
Talk by Wedad Elmaghraby, Maryland
November 7th, 2012

Wide spread use of information technology to capture and analyze data to support decision making in complex business situations has created a vibrant business segment: There are numerous consulting companies and software providers that specialize in pricing analytics.

Pricing optimization tools have been embraced by business-to-consumer (B2C) companies, such as retailers, airlines, and hotels. The next wave of adaptors of pricing optimization tools are companies in the business-to-business (B2B) arena. Pricing decisions in B2B organizations are not completely automated: Sales people are the ones who quote the prices to the customers and are responsible for "closing the deals" - as sales people typically have a "working relationship" with their customers. Considering the level of involvement of the sales people in the decision making process, and the frequent reluctance of sales people to adapt to change, it is not clear how much benefit a pricing optimization tool can provide in a B2B setting.

We have been given access to sales and pricing data for one of the largest grocery products distributors (GPD) in the United States who used a price recommendation tool over a two year period. We investigate how salespeople use the information provided to them to set the prices; of particular interest to us is how salespeople use price recommendations coming from a decision support tool. Despite the wariness of the managers in our company, we find that the price recommendation provided by the DST does serve as an effective reference price.

Our analysis shows that salespeople's decisions are well-explained by a two-stage decision model. Provided with a continuum of choices, we show that salespeople make an initial decision on whether or not to change a price (a binary decision) and then decide on the magnitude of change (a continuous response). The type of information most influential in the first stage varies from the information used in the second stage, indicating a hierarchy in information processing. We find that salespeople do differ in their reliance and receptiveness of pricing tool recommendations. In addition, we are able to identify cost-based windows of influence for the price recommendations. Our results have significant implications for the design of price optimization tools in settings where salespeople serve as the gatekeeper of price changes.

(Joint work with Wolfgang Jank, Itir Z. Karaesmen, and Shu Zhang)

 

"The Revenue Sharing in Airline Alliances"
Talk by Rene Caldentey
November 28, 2012

Airline alliances are a growing trend in the airline industry. From a revenue management perspective, one of the most significant features of these alliances are codeshare itineraries by which independent airlines can collaboratively market and operate flights. Different from traditional, monopolistic airline revenue management, alliance members control a decentralized network of resources through independent reservation and information systems.

In this research, we investigate contractual agreements between multiple airlines operating within a network alliance. We study contracts that specify how revenue should be split among the carriers. We propose a two-step hierarchical approach. We formulate a static problem in which airlines select partitioned allocations and show that a simple transfer price mechanism achieves first best. We study the dynamic problem and prove that the static transfer prices are asymptotically optimal.
(Joint work with Xing Hu, University of Oregon, and Gustavo Vulcano, NYU)

 


back to top

©2001 Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University