Kellogg News

More than 400 donors contribute to campaign, with funds going toward Annual Fund.

Kellogg equips leaders to play a crucial role in the successful use of data science in business

Renowned leader of social impact at Kellogg helped develop program

In just over four years, Kellogg's new lakefront home in Evanston has gone from long-term objective to fast-approaching reality

Three Kellogg social entrepreneurs will receive a total of $170,000 to launch and develop their startups

News & Events

“People intuitively believe that eating healthy foods in addition to unhealthy ones can decrease a meal’s calorie count,” says Associate Professor of Marketing Alexander Chernev.

Alexander Chernev

The dieter’s paradox

A new study by Alexander Chernev shows that weight-conscious individuals are more likely to believe in ‘negative’ calories

By Aaron Mays

9/20/2010 - Can adding a side salad to a cheeseburger help one lose weight? New research from the Kellogg School suggests that people, particularly those who characterize themselves as weight conscious, tend to believe that adding a healthy option to an otherwise indulgent meal will lower the total calorie count.

“Despite the growing availability of healthier, diet-friendly foods, the proliferation of diets and the increasing number of public policy initiatives aimed at obesity, the proportion of overweight individuals in the United States continues to increase,” said Alexander Chernev, study author and associate professor of marketing at the Kellogg School. “An important factor contributing to the obesity epidemic is the misguided belief about the relationship between a meal’s healthiness and its impact on weight gain. People intuitively believe that eating healthy foods in addition to unhealthy ones can decrease a meal’s calorie count.”

In earlier research, Chernev identified consumers’ tendency to underestimate their caloric intake. In his new study, Chernev builds on this concept, documenting a striking outcome: a propensity to incorrectly estimate calories is stronger among weight-conscious people, who would seem most likely to monitor their diets.

As part of the study, 934 participants from a nationwide online research panel were asked to estimate the caloric content of several meals. Some were shown a series of relatively unhealthy meals, and others were shown the same meals combined with a healthy option. For example, some of the participants were shown a bowl of chili with cheese, whereas the others were shown the same bowl of chili paired with a small green side salad. The other food pairs included a cheeseburger, which for some of the participants was paired with three celery sticks; a bacon-and-cheese waffle sandwich (paired with a small organic apple); and a meatball pepperoni cheesesteak (paired with a celery-and-carrot side dish).

The results were astounding. Those who viewed the chili alone rated it as averaging 699 calories. By contrast, those who were shown the chili combined with the green salad estimated the meal to have only 656 calories. Thus, adding a green salad to the bowl of chili lowered the perceived caloric content of the entire meal by 43 calories — as if the green salad had negative calories. This negative-calorie illusion was observed with all four meals tested, indicating the prevalence of the belief that one can consume fewer calories simply by adding a healthy item to a meal.

“Because people believe that adding a healthy option can lower a meal’s caloric content, the negative-calorie illusion can lead to overconsumption, thus contributing to the obesity trend,” said Chernev.

What was even more surprising, however, was that dieters — who are presumably more involved in monitoring their caloric intake and more familiar with the caloric content of different meal options —were even more likely to fall into the negative-calorie illusion trap. In fact, the illusion was twice as strong for the weight-conscious groups (who on average underestimated the combined meal by 76 calories or 10.8 percent) than for those who were rather indifferent about their weight (who on average underestimated the combined meal by 33 calories or 4.8 percent).

To combat the “dieter’s paradox,” as Chernev has coined this phenomenon, he recommends that the focus of current public policy campaigns shift away from the stereotypes associated with “good" and "bad" foods. When product ads and public policy communications stereotype foods into virtues and vices, they tend to shift peoples’ attention away from the quantity of food consumed. According to Chernev, this neglect of quantity might end up implicitly promoting the illusion of negative calories.

“The bottom line here is that motivating people to lose weight without educating them on how to monitor their caloric intake might not be enough to combat obesity. As the dieter’s paradox shows, motivation without knowledge can be counterproductive,” said Chernev. “Promoting the consumption of healthy foods without providing a complete picture of the factors influencing weight gain might paradoxically facilitate caloric overconsumption, leading to weight gain rather than weight loss.”

The study, “The Dieter’s Paradox,” will appear in the April 2011 issue of the Journal of Consumer Psychology. For more information or to arrange an interview with Professor Chernev, contact Aaron Mays.