| Inside
job
Enron investigator briefs values-based leadership class on
corporate ethics
By
Aubrey Henretty
November
9, 2007 - While it’s impossible to predict when
a company’s senior leadership might cross over from
creative accounting to reckless deceitfulness, said FBI Supervisory
Special Agent Paul Holdeman, corrupt bookkeepers do have one
thing in common: None of them ever said, “I want to
commit accounting fraud when I grow up.”
Holdeman,
who has been with the FBI since 1998, spoke about his work
on the Enron investigation to Professor Timothy
Feddersen’s Values-Based Leadership class
on Nov. 1. Holdeman’s professional background made him
a great fit for the case: Prior to joining the FBI he worked
for Arthur Andersen LLP.
“It’s
easy to sit here in this environment and say, ‘Oh, I’d
never do that,’” Holdeman said, but sometimes
it isn’t so easy to resist intense pressure to meet
quarterly goals or guard against demotion. It can be tougher
still to report illegal or unethical corporate behavior to
the authorities — especially for people complicit in
it.
During
his 90-minute presentation, “The Enron Investigation
and the Role of Whistleblowers,” Holdeman gave students
an overview of what happened at Enron and how the details
surfaced in the 2006 federal district court trial of former
CEOs Kenneth Lay and Jeffrey Skilling.
“The
key to the entire investigation was that we also developed
cooperators on the inside,” said Holdeman. “Without
them, the investigation would have been more difficult.”
Holdeman
said whistleblowers might come forward to appease their consciences
or to protect themselves from the legal consequences of their
crimes. Others agree to cooperate with the government only
after it becomes clear that mounting evidence will implicate
them should they keep quiet.
Throughout
the presentation at the Donald P. Jacobs Center, Holdeman
answered students’ questions, ranging from the serious
(How far down the chain of command does the bureau search
for enablers?) to the incredulous (With the overwhelming evidence
against them, why did Lay and Skilling not opt for plea bargains?
Did they really think they’d be acquitted?).
“People
treat them like kings,” said Holdeman, pointing out
that Lay once presented the Enron Prize for Distinguished
Public Service (now a humorously ironic relic) to then-chairman
of the Federal Reserve Board Alan Greenspan. “They don’t
see themselves as committing crimes.”
|