What
to do when the heat is on
Companies threatened by activists have several strategic choices,
says Prof. Daniel Diermeier. Ignorance is not among the options
By
Aubrey Henretty
July
11, 2007 - As the global economy barrels forward with
unprecedented speed, non-governmental organizations are watching
companies closely. If too much oil is burned, too many trees
are cut, a product fails, or a baby seal is injured somewhere
along the way, it’s just a matter of time before an
impassioned group of activists starts distributing flyers,
e-mails and other media alerts urging consumers to boycott
the offending firm. What’s the firm to do, especially
when blindsided by the attack, as frequently happens?
One thing it should not do, according to Kellogg School Professor
Daniel Diermeier, is panic: Most boycott attempts fail. The
real trouble comes from activists with a sharper awareness
of market dynamics and consumer behavior.
In “Strategic
Markets and Nonmarket Strategy,” research Diermeier
recently co-authored with former Kellogg colleague David Baron
(now a professor of political economy at Stanford University),
he evaluates the tactics NGOs employ to pressure firms to
change business practices contrary to NGO interests. The paper,
to be published in the summer 2007 issue of the Journal
of Economics and Management Strategy, posits that savvy
activists have become strategic innovators using more sophisticated
tactics than a simple call for a boycott.
“The
problem with boycotts is a collective action problem,”
Diermeier says. “Members of the public all need to bear
the cost of participating in a boycott individually, but the
benefits accrue to all citizens sympathetic with the cause
whether they actively participated or not. The costs of participating
[in a boycott] have to be very low.”
Another
characteristic common to successful NGO campaigns is negativity.
“Threats and punishments may reduce activity in the
industry,” in ways positive campaigns wouldn’t,
thereby serving the interests of the NGO, says Diermeier,
the IBM Distinguished Professor of Regulation and Competitive
Practice at Kellogg who also directs the Kellogg School’s
Ford Motor Company Center for Global Citizenship. He adds
that while NGO attack campaigns tend to take management by
surprise, some firms should be aware that they are more vulnerable
than others.
Well-known
consumer brands make good targets even when they’re
not the “worst offenders” in their industries,
he says, because activists know the actions of big brands
are more likely to attract public interest and, in turn, increase
pressure on the industry to change. “If you’re
a paper company, you may be a target for water pollution or
for logging, but the activists won’t target you directly”
because they will assume no one has heard of you. But if you
are a large distributor of a targeted paper company —
e.g. Office Depot or Kinko’s — activists may pull
you into the fight because of the power you wield over your
supplier.
Diermeier
says it is important for managers to keep an ear to the ground
for activist rumblings and to be aware of industry and company
weak spots. “You’ve got to know how this connects
with your business model,” he adds.
Of course,
the rules vary by industry. “Oil companies are more
vulnerable than entertainment companies,” says Diermeier.
Many oil companies delivering identical products makes action
against any one company easy and cost-effective for consumers,
he explains, but entertainment companies often produce unique
content not available elsewhere.
“If
your kids want to go to Disneyland, it’s very costly
to convince them to want to go to SeaWorld instead,”
he says, noting the ease with which customers might drive
a few extra blocks to fill up the gas tank at a different
station and the comparative difficulty moviegoers would have
finding a comparable substitute for “Pirates of the
Caribbean.”
Diermeier
says firms that find themselves head-to-head with activist
NGOs have three choices, each with its own set of challenges
— “You can fight, you can fold, or you can adopt
industry-wide strategies” — but they should never
assume the heat is off. |