Research Details

Abstract

Although the Guidelines should improve the predictability of the Agency's merger enforcement policy, it is not possible to remove the exercise of judgement from the evaluation of mergers under the antitrust laws. Because the specific standards set forth in the Guidelines must be applied to a broad range of possible factual circumstances, mechanical application of those standards may provide misleading answers to the economic questions raised under the antitrust laws. Moreover, information is often incomplete and the picture of competitive conditions that develops from historical evidence may provide an incomplete answer to the forward-looking inquiry of the Guidelines. Therefore, the Agency will apply the standards of the Guidelines reasonably and flexibly to the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed merger.

Type

Article

Author(s)

David Besanko, Daniel Spulber

Date Published

1993

Citations

Besanko, David, and Daniel Spulber. 1993. Contested Mergers and Equilibrium Antitrust Policy. Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization.(1): 1-29.