Logo Logo

A Mixed-Motive Perspective on the Economic Environment Debate, American Behavioral Scientist

Abstract

What is the relationship between economic development and environmental protection? Mirroring the negotiations field of fifteen years ago, the debate over this question has polarized into the opposing perspectives of win-lose (distributive bargaining) or win-win (integrative bargaining) outcomes. We argue that such polarization is both unnecessary and inaccurate. Conflict between economics and the environment is, at its core, what we will describe as a mixed-motive situation. In presenting this argument, we will draw from the negotiations and managerial decision-making literature to offer a mixed-motive perspective on the economics versus environment debate. Further, we will consider existing individual and institutional barriers to realizing the mixed-motive perspective and conclude with some strategies for overcoming them.

Type

Article

Author(s)

Andrew J. Hoffman, James J. Gillespie, Don A. Moore, Kimberly A. Wade-Benzoni, Leigh Thompson, Max H Bazerman

Date Published

1999

Citations

Hoffman, J. Andrew, James J. Gillespie, Don A. Moore, Kimberly A. Wade-Benzoni, Leigh Thompson, and Max H Bazerman. 1999. A Mixed-Motive Perspective on the Economic Environment Debate. American Behavioral Scientist. 42(8): 1254-1276.

KELLOGG INSIGHT

Explore leading research and ideas

Find articles, podcast episodes, and videos that spark ideas in lifelong learners, and inspire those looking to advance in their careers.
learn more

COURSE CATALOG

Review Courses & Schedules

Access information about specific courses and their schedules by viewing the interactive course scheduler tool.
LEARN MORE

DEGREE PROGRAMS

Discover the path to your goals

Whether you choose our Full-Time, Part-Time or Executive MBA program, you’ll enjoy the same unparalleled education, exceptional faculty and distinctive culture.
learn more