Research Details

Abstract

Since 1981, the U.S. federal government has operated a price support program to help sugar beet and sugar cane producers and processors. This complex program works through a combination of loans, import quotas, and duties. As a result, sugar prices in the United States are significantly higher than world prices. For example, in December 2001, U.S. consumers paid 22.9 cents per pound, while the world price was just 9 cents per pound. The General Accounting Office estimates that the total cost to consumers is $1.9 billion a year. This case uses a simple demand-and-supply framework, using real-world data, to assess the economic and political consequences of the U.S. sugar program. The case provides students with a vivid, fact-based illustration of welfare concepts such as consumer surplus, producer surplus, and dead-weight loss in a concrete, real-world market context.

Type

Case

Author(s)

Nabil Al-Najjar, Sandeep Baliga, Chris Forman

Date Published

01/01/2004

Citations

Al-Najjar, Nabil, Sandeep Baliga, and Chris Forman. Sugar Daddy: Quotas and the U.S. Government. Case 5-204-255 (KEL001).

PREVIEW or BUY