Research Details

Abstract

In this article, I define business method inventions and provide an economic framework to address the question of patentability raised in Bilski. A business method invention is the discovery of a commercial technique that firms can apply to address market opportunities. The initial implementation of a business method invention by firms is a Schumpeterian innovation. I advance several arguments in favor of business method patentability. Business method inventions are an important foundation for entrepreneurship and a channel for the commercialization of scientific and technological inventions. IP protections for business method inventions are essential for economic efficiency, including incentives for invention, efficient allocation of inventions, and transaction efficiencies in the market for discoveries. Business method inventions are significant because they are the foundation of what I term, the Business Revolution: the augmentation and replacement of human effort in business transactions by computers, communications systems, and the Internet. I conclude that the patent system should continue to provide intellectual property protections for business method inventions just as it does for other types of inventions. The question in this case turns on whether a patent can be issued for a claimed invention designed for the business world. Bilksi v. Kappos 561 U.S._(2010).

Type

Article

Author(s)

Daniel Spulber

Date Published

2011

Citations

Spulber, Daniel. 2011. Should Business Method Inventions be Patentable?. Journal of Legal Analysis.(1): 265-340.