Dispute Resolution Research CenterKellogg School of Management
Center InfoTeaching MaterialsEducationResearchContactKellogg Home
Decision Making Exercises
Negotiation Exercises
  Cross-Cultural
  Dispute Resolution
  Multiparty
  Third Party
  Two Party Deal Making
Teams Exercises
  Creativity
  Cross-Functional Teams
  Team Decision Making
  Team Dynamics
Supplemental Materials
Foreign Language Exercises
Additions, Updates and Corrections
Order Form (PDF 92 KB)
User Fee Invoice (PDF 64 KB)
 
 
Index
Search
Internal Site
Northwestern University

Teams Exercises
Team Decision Making

C-Suite
Author: Leigh Thompson
Source: KTAG

Revised


C-Suite is an exercise that challenges groups to organize quickly, develop roles, and enact norms. Leadership is critical.

Preparation: 10-20 minutes
Negotiation: 30 minutes
Debrief: 20-30 minutes


Carter Racing
Authors: Jack Brittain & Sim Sitkin; additional teaching notes by Margaret A. Neale
Source: DRRC

This exercise can be used to illustrate decision biases in negotiations. The exercise uses data from the Report of the Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident. Students are asked to use those data to make a decision whether or not to enter an automobile race.

Preparation: 20 minutes
Negotiation: 30-50 minutes


Day Care Task Force
Author: Leigh Thompson
Source: KTAG

In this multi-party exercise, a task force comprised of six people-five members of an organization and one external (non-employee) member-decide whether to implement a daycare facility within their organization. The exercise simulates a 12-month period in which members of the task force are given monthly reports of the success of the daycare center. Each month, the group must decide whether to continue or to terminate the facility. The exercise is designed to illustrate the escalation of commitment phenomenon in groups.

Preparation: 30-45 minutes
Group discussion: 60-90 minutes


The Endowed Chair
Author: Leigh Thompson
Source: KTAG

The Endowed Chair is a exercise that is designed to expose students to a common group decision-making situation in which relevant information is distributed differently among group members. The key challenge facing the group is to assemble all of the information and make the best choice possible.

Preparation: 30-35 minutes
Exercise: 45-60 minutes


Ozark River Bank
Author: Courtney Shelton Hunt
Source: DRRC
 


In this exercise, students take on the role of a general manager of the Ozark River Bank (ORB). The objective of the exercise is to have students select three individuals, from the five who are available, to work on a team to devise a restructuring plan for a local company that is anticipated to default on its loans. The exercise works on two levels. First, it allows students to address the interpersonal and skill factors that contribute to/detract from team functioning. Second, it provides students with direct experience in individual and group decision making. There are some key differences when the exercise is used to reinforce concepts related to intragroup dynamics and when it is used in the context of decision making. Teaching notes are supplied to provide guidelines for using the exercise in a groups/teams context and in a decision making context..

Negotiation: 45-60 minutes
Debrief: 30-40 minutes


PB Technologies
Author: Randall Peterson
Source: DRRC


PB Technologies is a hidden profile task designed to teach the importance of, and strategies for, effective information sharing in teams. In this activity the top management team of PB Technologies is asked to recommend to the CEO one of three finalists for the position of Chief Financial Officer (CFO). For one candidate the only common information is negative, and most groups eliminate her without discussion. If groups do discuss her and share information effectively they discover that she has the most positive profile overall. The other two candidates each have significant unshared negative information. One candidate has a moderate amount of negative information. Most of unshared information for the other is negative.

Preparation: 30 minutes
Discussion: 20 minutes
Debrief: 45-60 minutes


Sound Manufacturing
Authors: Leigh Thompson, Linda Argote & Richard L. Moreland
Source: KTAG

In this exercise, the benefits of group training are illustrated, as well as transactive memory structures. Four-person groups assemble an AM radio and then, several days later, groups assemble the radio from memory. [Note: AM/FM radio kits used in this exercise may be ordered from Radio Shack, Cat. No. #128-75]

Preparation: 30 minutes
Exercise: 120 minutes training session
Assembly: 90 minutes

  New
   

Threat Target
Authors: Leigh Thompson & Mary P. Flammang
Source: KTAG

Threat Target is a hidden profile exercise in which four analysts, each with somewhat different information, need to determine which of three terrorists poses the greatest threat to the United States. The exercise does not require experience in intelligence, but it was developed with input from CIA analysts and thus is very realistic.

Preparation: 30-45 minutes
Negotiation: 30-45 minutes
Debrief: 45-50 minutes

©2002 Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University