MANAGEMENT & ORGANIZATIONS; INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS & MARKETS
Professor of Management and Organizations
Radnor is a senior professor of Management and Organizations (a department he founded and chaired for 7 years) at Northwestern’s Kellogg School of Management, and Director of the National Science Foundation Center for Technology and Innovation Management (CTIM), located in the university’s Buffet Center for International and Comparative Studies. He is also chairman and co-founder of the 120-firm and 13-university Global Advanced Technology Innovation Consortium (GATIC), led by ETH-Zurich, the Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology as well as Northwestern, with further collaboration from such universities as the University of Cambridge, National University of Singapore, Technion, Israel (each with their associated networks of firms.)
CTIM has conducted and published on a wide variety of new technology innovation programs that reach across the academic-practice and technologyhumanism/ social divides and spearheads related student and executive level teaching programs in the US and worldwide. Recent initiatives include: A global network of point-of-care taskforces (LIGHT) that builds on a Next Generation USIsrael medical products program; a collaborative Midwest-China Solar Energy programme; for NSF on the Commercialization and Management of New Converging Technologies (nano, biotech, cognitive science and IT); on advanced innovation processes and tools (including road and other forms of decision mapping); sustainable innovation and design; a Knowledge Center based electronic library system in Ukraine; and, as a collaborator in IBM’s services and global innovation initiatives and leader of an outsourcing project.
Radnor studied mechanical engineering at Imperial College London, industrial engineering and management science at Northwestern, and business and economics at the London School of Economics. In the US he worked with Westinghouse and headed a high tech electrical start-up firm, with Israel Aircraft Industries and at Lucas Industries in the UK; he has consulted with many large and small firms and with US and international agencies.
Corporate Restructuring
Customer Service
Emerging Markets
Environmental Sustainability
Group Decision-Making
Implementation Theory
Organizational Change
Privatization
Technology
Technology roadmapping (TRM) has been applied successfully in a number of industrial organizations. Designed to facilitate and communicate technology strategy and planning, Roadmaps (or, as in Europe, route maps) can take a variety of specific forms, depending on the type (opportunities, capabilities, products, technologies, etc.) and particular company context. While they are generally manifest in a number of 'program elements or levels' superimposed upon a time-line, experienced roadmappers will often claim that it is “roadmapping” rather than “the roadmap” that generates the value. This paper primarily focuses on product and technology roadmaps and roadmapping. In the present and next issue of this journal a series of largely industry-developed papers will describe TRM, a technology management tool that is just now becoming widely used in the US and Europe, despite its approximately 25 years of history. In-company or corporate roadmapping (to distinguish from “Industry Roadmapping”) is becoming increasingly recognized as a powerful aid to achieve critically needed strategic focus, discipline and cross-unit integration of technology and product development programs as these move forward over time. The papers will describe how and why it is being used and with what results. For the most part, they derive from case experience developed through two industry-academic consortia, MATI (Management of Accelerated Technology Innovation, a US consortium with close links to Northwestern University) and the consortium affiliated with the Centre for Technology Management (CTM) at the University of Cambridge in the UK . In this introductory paper, we provide readers with a brief history of this technology roadmapping field as it has emerged on both sides of the Atlantic. We give an insight as to why and how certain major firms came to adopt and continue to use the approach, the range of applications and the new directions and developments in the field as practice advances. The essential link to Futures knowledge as part of a broader framework for Technology Management will also be discussed and Corporate Roadmapping will be placed in the larger spectrum of a domain that includes the related Industry Roadmapping field. Roadmapping, because it bridges between the conceptual and operations domains, also signals the need for and potential benefits to be gained from a healthy pattern of industry-academic cooperation. This pattern has become exemplified by the two US/UK consortia that are playing a leading role in the field’s development. This introductory section will also, therefore, briefly describe these consortia and how they have played this developmental role. The paper concludes with an overview of the four papers presented in this issue of Research and Technology Management and a preview of the five additional offerings that will appear in the issue to follow.
In this course, “sustainable” innovation includes but goes beyond “green” issues and compliance with environmental and corporate social responsibility edicts to consider a wide range of potential threats to the success of an innovation. Leading firms recognize that traditional innovation approaches are insufficient to meet the complexity of emerging strategic and organizational challenges in today’s quick-moving and interconnected global market. New perspectives and alliances, as well as the redefinition of core competencies, are required. But along with the pressures, the market also offers new opportunities for innovation. Competitive potential comes from new and converging technologies, emerging international social and economic development contexts, changing outsourcing and competitive behavior in services and manufacturing fields, broadened domain definition and enhanced stakeholder identification and interaction. Students in this practice-oriented course are introduced to key decision tools and apply them to case analyses and team-based projects. The class also assesses interrelated and underlying economic, developmental, historical, social and cultural-anthropological factors, with examples drawn from around the globe. This course may be used to satisfy the MORS major and also the sustainable design requirement of the Master of Science in Engineering Design and Innovation.
PHONE: 847-491-5617
FAX: 847-491-8896
Jacobs Center Room 365